参考质量效应下公平、利他偏好对供应链质量和营销策略的影响

马德青, 胡劲松

系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1752-1766.

PDF(1223 KB)
PDF(1223 KB)
系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1752-1766. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0333-15
论文

参考质量效应下公平、利他偏好对供应链质量和营销策略的影响

    马德青, 胡劲松
作者信息 +

Impact of member's fairness and altruistic preference on strategies of supply chain under reference quality effect

    MA Deqing, HU Jinsong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

消费者购物后体验到的产品实际质量和购物前预期的产品参考质量的差异往往会影响品牌的商誉和产品的市场需求.本文在消费者的参考质量效应背景下,研究了成员公平和利他行为对供应链产品质量和营销策略的影响.利用微分博弈理论,获得了无公平利他偏好、具公平偏好以及具他偏好三种行为模式下的成员策略以及绩效.研究发现:消费者过度地依赖品牌商誉评判参考质量会挫伤零售商营销的积极性,但在某些情况下可以激励制造商提高产品质量水平,而参考质量效应的影响取决于决策模式.成员的公平偏好行为虽然会提升成员的公平效用,但会加重参考质量效应的不利影响,对供应链绩效产生损害,加重供应链的双重边际效应,是一种负向的社会偏好.成员的利他行为不仅能减缓参考质量效应的不利影响,还能激发成员决策的积极性,对分散决策模式下的绩效进行帕累托改进,还能获得额外的社会福利,是一种正向的社会偏好.此外,制造商和零售商均持完全利他态度时,供应链能够实现完美协调.

Abstract

The difference between the actual product quality experienced by consumers after shopping and the expected product reference quality before shopping often affects brand reputation and product market demand. Under the background of the reference quality effect of consumers, this paper studies the impacts of members' fair and altruistic behavior on the quality of supply chain members and marketing strategies. By using the differential game theory, the membership strategies and performance under three behavior modes, namely, unfair altruistic preference, fair preference and other preference, are obtained. The study found that consumers' excessive dependence on brand goodwill to judge reference quality would dampen the enthusiasm of retailers' marketing, but in some cases can encourage manufacturers to improve product quality, and the impact of reference quality effects depends on the decision-making model. Although members' fair preference behavior will enhance the fair use of members, it will increase the negative impact of reference quality effect, damage the supply chain performance, and aggravate the double marginal effect of supply chain. It is a negative social preference. Members' altruistic behavior can not only slow down the adverse effects of reference quality effects, but also stimulate the enthusiasm of members' decision-making, Pareto improvement of performance under decentralized decision-making mode, and gain additional social benefits. It is a positive social preference. In addition, the supply chain is perfectly coordinated when both manufacturers and retailers are fully altruistic.

关键词

参考质量效应 / 公平 / 利他 / 微分博弈 / 质量 / 营销策略

Key words

reference quality effects / fairness / altruism / differential game / quality level / marketing strategy

引用本文

导出引用
马德青 , 胡劲松. 参考质量效应下公平、利他偏好对供应链质量和营销策略的影响. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(7): 1752-1766 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0333-15
MA Deqing , HU Jinsong. Impact of member's fairness and altruistic preference on strategies of supply chain under reference quality effect. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(7): 1752-1766 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0333-15
中图分类号: F224   

参考文献

[1] Chiang W Y K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits:A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(1):1-20.
[2] Hellofs L L, Jacobson R. Market share and customers' perceptions of quality:When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality?[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1999, 63(1):16-25.
[3] Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1970, 78(2):311-329.
[4] Johnson E J, Fader P S. Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice[J]. Marketing Science, 1993, 12(4):378-394.
[5] Conrad K. Quality, advertising and the formation of goodwill under dynamic conditions[M]. North Holland, 1985.
[6] Giovanni P D. Should a retailer support a quality improvements strategy?[M]//Advances in Dynamic Games. Springer International Publishing, 2013:125-148.
[7] Ouardighi F E, Kogan K. Dynamic conformance and design quality in a supply chain:An assessment of contracts' coordinating power[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2013, 211(1):137-166.
[8] He Y, Zhang J, Gou Q, et al. Supply chain decisions with reference quality effect under the O2O environment[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2017(1):1-20.
[9] Chenavaz R. Dynamic quality policies with reference quality effects[J]. Applied Economics, 2018, 49:1-7.
[10] Gavious A, Lowengart O. Price-quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects[J]. Marketing Letters, 2012, 23(1):137-161.
[11] Liu G, Sethi S P, Zhang J. Myopic vs. far-sighted behaviours in a revenue-sharing supply chain with reference quality effects[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(5):1-24.
[12] Ottone S. Fairness:A survey[R]. Department of Public Policy and Public Choice, University of Eastern Piedmont "Amedeo Avogadro", Working Papers, 2006.
[13] Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental study of ultimatum bargaining[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 1982, 3(4):367-388.
[14] List J A, Cherry T L. Learning to accept in ultimatum games:Evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers[J]. Experimental Economics, 2000, 3(1):11-29.
[15] Forsythe R, Horowitz J L, Savin N E, et al. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments[J]. Games Economic Behavior, 1994, 6(3):347-369.
[16] Hoffman E, Mccabe K A, Smith V L. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1996, 25(3):289-301.
[17] Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, et al. In search of homo economics:Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies[J]. American Economic Review, 2001, 91(2):73-78.
[18] Cherry T L, Frykblom P, Shogren J F. Hardnose the dictator[J]. American Economic Review, 2002, 92(4):1218-1221.
[19] Fehr E, Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation:The economics of reciprocity[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, 14(3):159-181.
[20] Andreoni J, Miller J. Giving according to GARP:An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism[J]. Econometrica, 2002, 70(2):737-753.
[21] 林志炳. 基于利他属性的双渠道供应链研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(12):126-134. Lin Z B. Analysis of dual channel supply chain based on altruism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(12):126-134.
[22] Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8):1303-1314.
[23] 杜少甫, 杜婵, 梁樑,等. 考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(11):41-48. Du S F, Du C, Liang L, et al. Supply chain coordination considering fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2010, 13(11):41-48.
[24] 杜少甫, 朱贾昂, 高冬,等. Nash讨价还价公平参考下的供应链优化决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3):68-72. Du S F, Zhu J A, Gao D, et al. Optimal decision-making for Nash bargaining fairness concerned newsvendor in two-level supply chain[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2013, 16(3):68-72.
[25] 张克勇,吴燕,侯世旺. 具公平关切零售商的闭环供应链差别定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(3):51-58. Zhang K Y, Wu Y, Hou S W. Differential pricing strategy of considering retailer's fairness concerns in the closed-loop supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(3):51-58.
[26] Ma P, Li K W, Wang Z J. Pricing decisions in closed-loop supply chains with marketing effort and fairness concerns[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(2):1-22.
[27] 聂腾飞, 何碧玉, 杜少甫. 考虑公平关切及其谈判破裂点的供应链运作[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(10):92-102. Nie T F, He B Y, Du S F. Supply chain operations considering fairness concerns with bargaining disagreement point[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(10):92-102.
[28] 刘威志, 李娟, 张迪,等. 公平感对供应链成员定价决策影响的研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(7):115-126. Liu W Z, Li J, Zhang D, et al. Fairness effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(7):115-126.
[29] 马德青, 胡劲松. 零售商具相对公平的闭环供应链随机微分博弈模型[J]. 管理学报, 2018(3):467-474. Ma D Q, Hu J S. Stochastic differential game model of closed-loop supply chain with retailer's relative fairness[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018(3):467-474.
[30] Bassi M, Pagnozzi M, Piccolo S. Optimal contracting with altruism and reciprocity[J]. Research in Economics, 2014, 68(1):27-38.
[31] Ge Z, Zhang Z K, Lü L, et al. How altruism works:An evolutionary model of supply networks[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics Its Applications, 2012, 391(3):647-655.
[32] Ge Z, Hu Q. Who benefits from altruism in supply chain management?[J]. American Journal of Operations Research, 2012, 2(1):59-72.
[33] Shi K, Jiang F, Ouyang Q. Altruism and pricing strategy in dual-channel supply chains[J]. American Journal of Operations Research, 2013, 3(4):402-412.
[34] Nerlove M, Arrow K J. Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions[J]. Economica, 1962, 29(114):129-142.

基金

国家自然科学基金(71771129)
PDF(1223 KB)

813

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/