在军事对抗中，将作战双方抽象为防御方（红方）和进攻方（蓝方），研究红方的射击战斗问题.本文讨论蓝方目标无差别和目标多类型两种情况下的射击战斗，解决以下三个问题：一是在射击-射击策略下，基于给定的射弹和目标数，给出了红方获得最大防御效率（defense effectiveness，DE）时射弹的分配方法；二是在射击-观察-射击策略下，考虑射击次数和齐射弹数等因素，给出了红方多次射击的DE迭代递推生成方法；三是给出了影响DE两个重要基础因素（射弹需求量和射击次数）的通用计算方法.通过仿真分析对本文给出的方法验证，保证了方法的可行性.
Abstract
A lot of military confrontation scenarios can be viewed as a shooting battle problem for the defense weapons (Red) to shoot the offense target (Blue). We consider two kinds of blue targets, homogeneous and heterogeneous. Firstly, for shoot-shoot strategy, interceptors' allocation method to gain maximum defense effectiveness (DE) is proposed for given number of red interceptors and blue targets. Secondly, for salvo-look-salvo strategy, in consideration of the factors such as shooting times and salvo size, the iterative recursive generation method for DE of red salvo shootings. Thirdly, the general calculation method of two important factors (interceptors requirements and available shooting times) affecting DE is given. Simulation examples validate the methods of this paper.
关键词
射击模式 /
齐射-观察-齐射 /
防御效率 /
生成函数
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
shooting mode /
salvo-look-salvo /
defense effectiveness /
generating function
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号：
E917
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李龙跃, 刘付显, 赵麟锋. 对多波次目标直接分配到弹的反导火力规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(11):2206-2211. Li L Y, Liu F X, Zhao L F. Direct interceptor allocation method in antimissile firepower planning for multiple wave targets[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(11):2206-2211.
[2] 肖金科, 王刚, 李为民, 等. 区域反导目标分配模型优化分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(14):1027-1034. Xiao J K, Wang G, Li W M, et al. Optimization on target assignment model in theater anti-missile system[J]. Systems Engineering——Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(14):1027-1034.
[3] Soland R M. Optimal terminal defence tactics when several sequential engagements are possible[J]. Operations Research, 1987, 35(4):537-542.
[4] Naeem H, Masood A. An optimal dynamic threat evaluation and weapon scheduling technique[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2010, 23:337-342.
[5] Glazebrook K, Washburn A. Shoot-look-shoot:A review and extension[J]. Operations Research, 2004, 52(3):454-463.
[6] Li L Y, Liu F X, Long G Z, et al. Modified particle swarm optimization for BMDS interceptor resource planning[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2016, 44(3):471-488.
[7] Aviv Y, Kress M. Evaluation the effectiveness of shoot-look-shoot tactics in the presence of incomplete damage information[J]. Military Operations Research, 1997, 3(1):78-89.
[8] Armstrong M J. Effective attacks in the Salvo Combat model:Salvo sizes and quantities of targets[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2007, 54(1):66-77.
[9] Armstrong M J. The Salvo Combat model with area fire[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2013, 60(8):652-660.
[10] Nguyen B, Miah S. Analysis of maritime air defence scenarios[M]. Defence Research and Development Canada, 2014.
[11] Bourn S. Probabilistic shoot-look-shoot combat models[D]. Adelaide:The University of Adelaide, 2012.
[12] Miah S, Nguyen B, Spinello D, et al. Maritime air defence firing tactics[R]. Defence Research and Development Canada, 2014, DRDC-RDDC-2014-P36.
[13] Nguyen B, Smith P, Nguyen D. An engagement model to optimize defense against a multiple attack assuming perfect kill assessment[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 1997, 44(7):687-697.
[14] Dutta D. Probabilistic analysis of anti-ship missile defence effectiveness[J]. Defence Science Journal, 2014, 64(2):123-129.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
全军军事类研究生资助课题；2014年空军工程大学优秀博士学位论文扶持基金
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(987 KB)
