目前文献中对于服务型领导理论的研究多集中于个体层面, 在团队层面将服务型领导对团队绩效的影响过程看成是团队成员间的交换过程. 基于社会交换理论探讨了服务型领导对团队绩效的影响机制, 尤其是领导成员交换和团队成员交换在其中的中介作用, 以及团队差序氛围在其中的调节作用. 研究结果发现: 服务型领导与团队绩效显著正相关, 领导成员交换和团队成员交换在两者之间的关系中起完全中介作用, 团队差序氛围对服务型领导与团队绩效之间的关系具有显著的正向调节作用. 研究告诉团队领导者, 不仅要通过塑造自身的服务型领导风格来实现对团队差序氛围的替代作用, 同时还要善于为团队成员营造一种高质量领导成员交换和团队成员交换的感受, 从而提高团队绩效.
Abstract
Previous research about servant leadership mainly focuses on the individual level, while the relevant research on the team level is relatively limited. In order to explore the mechanism of servant leadership on team performance, this article based on the social exchange theory, sees the mechanism of servant leadership on team performance as an exchange process among team members, especially the mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX), team-member exchange (TMX), and the moderating role of team chaxu climate. The results of the analysis showed that servant leadership has a positive impact on team performance. There are mediating effects of LMX and TMX between servant leadership and team performance. It also reports that there is a moderating effect of team chaxu climate between servant leadership and team performance. According to the results, team leaders not only achieve the substitution to team chaxu climate through shaping their own service-oriented leadership style, but also construct the high quality perceptions of LMX and TMX, in order to improve team performance.
关键词
服务型领导 /
团队绩效 /
领导成员交换 /
团队成员交换 /
团队差序氛围
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
servant leadership /
team performance /
leader-member exchange /
team-member exchange /
team chaxu climate
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Tsui A S, Wang H, Xin K, et al. Let a thousand flowers bloom: Variation of leadership styles among Chinese CEOs[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2004, 33(1): 5-40.
[2] Burke C, Stagl K, Klein C, et al. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(3): 288-307.
[3] Day D, Gronn P, Salas E. Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(3): 211-216.
[4] 张新安, 何惠, 顾锋. 家长式领导行为对团队绩效的影响: 团队冲突管理方式的中介作用[J]. 管理世界, 2009(3): 121-133.Zhang X A, He H, Gu F. The impact of paternalistic leadership on team performance: The mediating role of team conflict's management styles[J]. Management World, 2009(3): 121-133.
[5] Bass B, Avolio B, Jung D, et al. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(2): 207-218.
[6] Dionne S D, Yammarino F J, Atwater L E, et al. Transformational leadership and team performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2004, 17(2): 177-193.
[7] Irving J A, Longbotham G. Servant leadership predictors of team effectiveness: Findings and implications[J]. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 2007, 15(2): 82-94.
[8] Irving J A, Longbotham G. Team effectiveness and six essential servant leadership themes: A regression model based on items in the organizational leadership assessment[J]. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2007, 2(2): 98-113.
[9] Greenleaf R K. Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness[M]. New York: Paulist, 1977.
[10] Spears L. Reflections on Robert K. Greenleaf and servant-leadership[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 1996, 17(7): 33-35.
[11] Liden R C, Graen G. Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(3): 451-465.
[12] Seers A, Petty M M, Cashman J F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment[J]. Group & Organization Management, 1995, 20(1): 18-38.
[13] Kamdar D, Van Dyne L. The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange in predicting OCB and task performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 1286-1298.
[14] 刘军, 章凯, 仲理峰. 工作团队差序氛围的形成与影响: 基于追踪数据的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2009(8): 92-101.Liu J, Zhang K, Zhong L F. The formation and impact of the atmosphere of the ''error routine" of the work team: A case study based on successive data[J]. Management World, 2009(8): 92-101.
[15] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1985.Fei X T. Rural China[M]. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1985.
[16] 刘增合. 儒教经济伦理观念''差序格局"界论[J]. 孔子研究, 2000(2): 21-31.Liu Z H. Study on the chaxu structure of confucian ethics[J]. Confucius Studies, 2000(2): 21-31.
[17] Russell R F, Stone A G. A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2002, 23(3): 145-157.
[18] Barbuto J E, Wheeler D W. Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2006, 31(3): 300-326.
[19] Liden R C, Wayne S J, Zhao H, et al. Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measures and multilevel assessment[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19(2): 161-177.
[20] 吴维库, 姚迪. 服务型领导与员工满意度的关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2009(3): 338-341.Wu W K, Yao D. Relationship between servant leadership and employee satisfaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2009(3): 338-341.
[21] Flood P C, Hannan E, Smith K G, et al. Chief executive leadership style, consensus decision making and top management team effectiveness[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2000, 9(3): 401-420.
[22] Graen G B, Uhl-Blen M. Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2): 219-247.
[23] Liden R C, Wayne S, Stilwell D. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchange[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(4): 662-674.
[24] Wayne S J, Ferris G R. Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(5): 487-499.
[25] Robbins S P, Coulter M. Management[M]. 7th ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004.
[26] Seers A. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 43(1): 118-135.
[27] Jordan M H, Field H S, Armenakis A A. The relationship of group process variables and team performance-A team-level analysis in a field setting[J]. Small Group Research, 2002, 33(1): 121-150.
[28] Dose J. The relationship between work values similarity and team-member and leader-member exchange relationships[J]. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1999, 3(1): 20-32.
[29] Graham J W. Servant leadership in organization: Inspirational and moral[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1991, 2(2): 105-119.
[30] 郑伯埙. 差序格局与华人组织行为[J]. 本土心理学研究, 1995(3): 142-219.Cheng B X. Chaxu structure and Chinese organizational behavior[J]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 1995(3): 142-219.
[31] Lind E A, Kray L J, Thompson L. Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 2001, 85(2): 189-210.
[32] 孙健敏, 王碧英. 公仆型领导: 概念的界定与量表的修订[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2010, 223(5): 24-30.Sun J M, Wang B Y. Servant leadership: Scale development and construct clarification[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2010, 223(5): 24-30.
[33] 刘贞妤. 差序气氛对部属工作态度与行为之影响[D]. 花莲: 台湾东华大学, 2003.Liu Z Y. The impact of chaxu atmosphere on employees' working attitudes and behaviors[D]. Hualian: National Dong Hwa University, 2003.
[34] Zellmer-Bruhn M E, Gibson C B. Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(3): 501-518.
[35] James L R. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67(2): 219-229.
[36] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
[37] Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家社会科学基金(10BGL033); 国家自然科学基金(71001028); 教育部博士点专项科研基金(20100072110010)
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(1003 KB)
