Ecosystem evaluation method based on adaptive reciprocity

HOU Fang

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 571-588.

PDF(13413 KB)
PDF(13413 KB)
Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 571-588. DOI: 10.12011/SETP2023-1806

Ecosystem evaluation method based on adaptive reciprocity

  • HOU Fang1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Enterprise ecosystems take into account upstream and downstream relationships as well as physical layout in the operation process of production elements to construct an association network through the coupling structure and functional mechanism. This research creates an integrated assessment approach to investigate the corporate ecosystem mechanism and analyze how to assess the adaptive reciprocity issue under various circumstances. The state of the chain cluster is assessed using the network node's structural characteristics, which are based on system clustering characteristics (such as functional or resource clustering). Taking into account the enterprise ecosystem's network structure, the chain cluster reciprocity utility is enhanced through the joint distribution of the chain cluster reciprocity utility and the chain cluster reciprocity evaluation. In order to measure the adaptive changes of network nodes in the ecosystem, the network node reciprocity judgment also makes a distinction between the types of connections—connections with newly established reciprocal nodes, connections with existing nodes, and random connections. Combining the co-circulation properties of the higher order network structural factors modifies the nodes' response to the ecosystem. The study's application scenarios cover embedded and de-embedded assessment modes in particular scenarios, as well as how to integrate assessment aspects and decide which elements to incorporate. Chains are the main emphasis of the embedded evaluation, while nodes are the main focus of the de-embedded evaluation. The enterprise ecosystem can be found in a number of states following regulation, including ideal, positive, development, structural adjustment, growth, and mismatch states. In order to assist enterprises in optimizing and regulating the ecosystem structure based on adaptive reciprocity, this study offers a research perspective of integrated evaluation for enterprise ecosystem research and analyzes the decision proposals of adaptive reciprocity in various application scenarios.

Key words

integrated evaluation / adaptive reciprocity / ecosystem / scenario

Cite this article

Download Citations
HOU Fang. Ecosystem evaluation method based on adaptive reciprocity. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2025, 45(2): 571-588 https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2023-1806

References

[1] Pauli B, Oña L, Hermann M. Obligate mutualistic cooperation limits evolvability[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 337.
[2] 张瑞敏. 生态品牌: 第四次工业革命中再生的新范式[J]. 清华管理评论, 2021(9): 16-28. Zhang R M. Eco-branding: A new paradigm for regeneration in the fourth industrial revolution[J]. Tsinghua Management Review, 2021(9): 16-28.
[3] Artime O, Grassia M, De Domenico M. et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2024(6): 114-131.
[4] Bingham E P, Ratcliff W C. A nonadaptive explanation for macroevolutionary patterns in the evolution of complex multicellularity[J]. PNAS, 2024, 121(7): e2319840121.
[5] Hobhouse L T. Morals in evolution: A study in comparative ethics[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1906.
[6] Simmel G. The sociology of Georg Simmel[M]. Kurt Wolff. Glencoe, III: Free Press, 1950.
[7] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology 1985, 91(3): 481-510.
[8] Lazega E, Pattison E P. Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study[J]. Social Networks, 1999, 21(1): 67-90.
[9] Zuckerman E W, Sgourev V S. Peer capitalism: Parallel relationships in the U.S. economy[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2006, 111(5): 1327-1366.
[10] Westphal J D, Edward J Z. Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1): 161-183.
[11] Kollock P. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1994, 100(2): 313-345.
[12] Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect[J]. American Sociological Review, 1996, 61(4): 674-698.
[13] Blau P M. Exchange and power in social life[M]. New York: Wiley, 1964.
[14] Emerson R M. Social exchange theory[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1976, 2: 335-362.
[15] Molm D L. The structure of reciprocity[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2010, 73(2): 119-131.
[16] Takahashi N. The emergence of generalized exchange[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2000, 105(4): 1105-1134.
[17] Kranton R E. Reciprocal exchange: A self-sustaining system[J]. The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(4): 830-851.
[18] Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A Study of the governance of exchange relationships[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37(1): 76-104.
[19] Molm L D, Takahashi N, Peterson G. In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange[J]. American Sociological Review, 2003, 68(1): 128-152.
[20] Molm L D, Peterson G, Takahashi N. Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange[J]. American Sociological Review, 1999, 64(6): 876-889.
[21] Cook K S, Emerson R M. Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks[J]. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43(5): 721-739.
[22] Tansley A G. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms[J]. Ecology, 1935, 16(3): 284-307.
[23] Thebault E, Fontaine C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks[J]. Science, 2010, 5993(329): 853-856.
[24] 马奇, 苏敏. 敌对-植物-互惠适应性网络的稳定性动态[J]. 大学数学, 2023, 39(2): 1-7. Ma Q, Su M. Stability of adaptive herbivore-plant-pollinator multilayer networks[J]. College Mathematics, 2023, 39(2): 1-7.
[25] Moore J F, Rong K, Zhang R M. The human ecosystem[J]. Journal of Digital Economy, 2022(1): 53-72.
[26] Moore J F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71(3): 75-86.
[27] Cohen B. Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2006, 15(1): 1-14.
[28] 陈劲. 企业创新生态系统论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017. Chen J. Enterprise innovation ecosystem theory[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[29] Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(1): 39-58.
[30] Van der Borgh M, Cloodt M, Romme A G L. Value creation by knowledgebased ecosystems: Evidence from a field study[J]. R&D Management, 2012, 42(2): 150-169.
[31] Scaringella L, Agnieszka R. Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 59-87.
[32] Gupta R, Mejia C, Kajikawa Y. Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 147(18): 100-109.
[33] De Meyer A, Williamson J P. Ecosystem edge: Sustaining competitiveness in the face of disruption[M]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2020.
[34] Iansiti M, Levien R. Strategy as ecology[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 82(3): 68-81.
[35] Walker B L, Nie Q. NeST: Nested hierarchical structure identification in spatial transcriptomic data[J]. Nature Communication, 2023, 14: 6554.
[36] Suweis S, Simini F, Banavar J R, et al. Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualisticnetworks[J]. Nature, 2013, 500(7463): 449-452.
[37] Mariani M S, Ren Z M, Bascompte J, et al. Nestedness in complex networks: Observation, emergence, and implications[J]. Physics Reports, 2019, 813: 1-90.
[38] Arthur W B. Complexity and the economy[J]. Science, 1999, 284(5411): 107-109.
[39] Hannan M T, Freeman J. The population ecology of organization[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82(5): 929-964.
[40] Paquin R L, Grenville J H. The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2012, 16(1): 83-93.
[41] Gawer A, Cusumano M A. Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(3): 417-433.
[42] 欧忠辉, 朱祖平, 夏敏, 等. 创新生态系统共生演化模型及仿真研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(12): 49-57. Ou Z H, Zu Z P, Xia M, et al. Symbiotic evolution model and simulation study of innovation ecosystem[J]. Research Management, 2017, 38(12): 49-57.
[43] 张群祥, 朱程昊, 严响. 农户和龙头企业共生模式演化机制研究——基于生态位理论[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(8): 201-209. Zhang Q X, Zhu C H, Yan X. Research on the evolution mechanism of symbiosis mode between farmers and dragon-head enterprises—Based on ecological niche theory[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2017, 37(8): 201-209.
[44] 张影, 高长元, 王京. 跨界创新联盟生态系统共生演化模型及实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30 (6): 200-212. Zhang Y, Gao C Y, Wang J. Symbiotic evolution model and empirical study of cross-border innovation alliance ecosystem[J]. China Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 200-221.
[45] 丁玲, 吴金希. 核心企业与商业生态系统的案例研究: 互利共生与捕食共生战略[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(7): 244-257. Ding L, Wu J X. Case study of core enterprise and business ecosystems: Strategies of mutualism symbiosis and predation symbiosis[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(7): 244-257.
[46] 王耀德, 许其彬. 电子商务价值生态系统的构建[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2018(2): 64-69. Wang Y D, Xu Q B. The construction of e-commerce value ecosystem[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2018(2): 64-69.
[47] Isenberg D J. How to start an entrepreneurial revolution[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(6): 40-50.
[48] Taylor C. Sources of the self-the making of the modern identity[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[49] Newman E J M. Estimating network structure from unreliable measurements[J]. Physical Review, 2018, 98(6): 062321.
[50] 殷思梦, 邢李志, 张鹏杨, 等. 基于嵌套结构理论的亚太区域生产网络稳定性分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(11): 3214-3288. Yin S M, Xing L Z, Zhang P Y, et al. Stability analysis of production networks in the ASIA-pacific region based on nested structure theory[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2023, 43(11): 3214-3288.
[51] 刘 鹏, 王一凡, 刘惠宇, 等. 同质相吸与差异偏好机制驱动的智慧群体结构演化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(1): 372-386. Liu P, Wang Y F, Liu H Y, et al. Structural evolution of intelligent collectives driven by homophily and heterophily[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2024, 44(1): 372-386.
[52] 乔晗, 徐君如, 张硕. 基于系统动力学的社群电商价值创造影响效应研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(9): 2615-2631. Qiao H, Xu J R, Zhang S. Research on the impact of community e-commerce value creation based on system dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2023, 43(9): 2615-2631.
[53] 陈劲. 整合式创新——新时代创新范式探索[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021. Chen J. Integrated innovation—Exploring innovation paradigms in the new era[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.
[54] Monderer D, Shapley L S. Potential games[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1996, 14(1): 124-143.
[55] Fan T L, Lv L Y, Shi D H, et al. Characterizing cycle structure in complex networks[J]. Communications Physics, 2021, 4: 272.
[56] Xu Z S. Hesitant fuzzy set theory[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2014.
[57] 徐泽水, 张申. 概率犹豫模糊决策理论与方法综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(1): 42-51. Xu Z S, Zhang S. A review of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy decision-making theories and methods[J]. Control and Decision Making, 2021, 36(1): 42-51.
[58] 敖翔. 管理会计报告框架变革驱动组织生态共赢——海尔共赢增值表的设计与应用探索[J]. 管理会计研究, 2021, 4(6): 48-55. Ao X. Change of management accounting reporting framework drives organisational ecological win-win: Design and application exploration of Haier's win-win value-added table[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2021, 4(6): 48-55.
[59] 张瑞敏. 链群共赢, 千条江河归大海[J]. 中外管理, 2019(10): 66-73. Zhang R M. Chain group win-win, a thousand rivers to the sea[J]. Chinese and Foreign Management, 2019(10): 66-73.

Funding

Liaoning Province "One Million Talents" Project (LNBQW2018Q0145);National Natural Science Foundation of China (71401109)
PDF(13413 KB)

159

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/