Modelling the choice of shippers on inland river ports for in a multi-modal transportation network

TAN Zhijia, ZENG Xianyang, MENG Qiang

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 1391-1401.

PDF(1620 KB)
PDF(1620 KB)
Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 1391-1401. DOI: 10.12011/SETP2021-0266

Modelling the choice of shippers on inland river ports for in a multi-modal transportation network

  • TAN Zhijia1, ZENG Xianyang1, MENG Qiang2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The determination of port hinterland is an important basis for port location, function and scale positioning. Different from the traditional quantitative analysis method based on geographical distance, this paper first constructs a continuous-discrete network structure. In this way, we can simultaneously consider the topological characteristics of dense urban roads, sparse highway network and discrete water transport system and the spatial continuously distribution of shipment demand. Therefore, the generalized transportation cost can be calculated to capture the cumulative choice probability of shippers on routes and ports in multi-modal transport network, which plots the hinterland of each inland river port. Taking the Yangtze River economic belt as an example, we find that the port hinterland is no longer a geographical neighbourhood of the port, but diffuses along the highway entrances and exits. This study enriches the traditional model of port hinterland analysis. The method proposed in this paper is conducive to the planning of port location and function positioning, and the formulation of competitive strategy between port and shipping enterprises.

Key words

inland ports / hinterland / continuous-discrete network / multi-modal transportation

Cite this article

Download Citations
TAN Zhijia , ZENG Xianyang , MENG Qiang. Modelling the choice of shippers on inland river ports for in a multi-modal transportation network. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2022, 42(5): 1391-1401 https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2021-0266

References

[1] 王帆, 黄锦佳, 刘作仪. 港口管理与运营:新兴研究热点及其进展[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(5):111-126. Wang F, Huang J J, Liu Z Y. Port management and operations:Emerging research topics and progress[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(5):111-126.
[2] Cleef E V. Hinterland and Umland[J]. Geographical Review, 1941, 31(2):308-311.
[3] Klink H A V, Berg G C V D. Gateways and intermodalism[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 1998, 6(1):1-9.
[4] Notteboom T, Rodrigue J P. Re-assessing port-hinterland relationships in the context of global commodity chains[C]//International Workshop on Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, 2007.
[5] Wan S L, Luan W X, Ma Y, et al. On determining the hinterlands of China's foreign trade container ports[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 85:102725.
[6] 杨家其. 基于模糊综合评判的现代港口腹地划分引力模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2002, 2(2):123-126. Yang J Q. Gravity model for partitioning port hinterlands based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2002, 2(2):123-126.
[7] Santos T A, Soares C G. Container terminal potential hinterland delimitation in a multi-port system subject to a regionalization process[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 75:132-146.
[8] Meng Q, Wang X. Utility-based estimation of probabilistic port hinterland for networks of intermodal freight transportation[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2168(1):53-62.
[9] Wang X, Meng Q, Miao L. Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows:Model and algorithm[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 88:32-51.
[10] Yuen C L A, Zhang A, Cheung W. Port competitiveness from the users' perspective:An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2012, 35(1):34-40.
[11] Lorena G A, Joaquin S S. Analysis of the evolution of the inland traffic distribution and provincial hinterland share of the spanish port system[J]. Transport Reviews, 2010, 30(3):275-297.
[12] Li D, Qu Y, Ma Y. Study on the impact of subsidies for overlapping hinterland shippers on port competition[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020, 135:24-37.
[13] Zondag B, Bucci P, Gützkow P, et al. Port competition modeling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics[J]. Maritime Policy and Management, 2010, 37(3):179-194.
[14] Song D P, Lyons A, Li D, et al. Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 87:75-96.
[15] Bontekoning Y M, Macharis C, Trip J J. Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?-A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2004, 38(1):1-34.
[16] Tan Z J, Wang Y D, Meng Q, et al. Joint ship schedule design and sailing speed optimization for a single inland shipping service with uncertain dam transit time[J]. Transportation Science, 2018, 52(6):1570-1588.
[17] Yang H, Yagar S, Iida Y. Traffic assignment in a congested discrete/continuous transportation system[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1994, 28(2):161-174.
[18] Bhat C R. Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models:Econometric structure and application to intercity travel[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 1997, 31(1):11-21.
[19] Wang G, Chen A, Kitthamkesorn S, et al. A multi-modal network equilibrium model with captive mode choice and path size logit route choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020, 136:293-317.
[20] Tan Z, Li W, Zhang X, et al. Service charge and capacity selection of an inland river port with location-dependent shipping cost and service congestion[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 76:13-33.
[21] Tan Z, Meng Q, Wang F, et al. Strategic integration of the inland port and shipping service for the ocean carrier[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 110:90-109.
[22] Song Z, Tang W, Zhao R. A simple game theoretical analysis for incentivizing multi-modal transportation in freight supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 283(1):152-165.
[23] Small K A, Song S. Population and employment densities:Structure and change[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1994, 36(3):229-313.
[24] De Cea J, Fernández E. Transit assignment for congested public transport system:An equilibrium model[J]. Transportation Science, 1993, 27(2):133-147.
[25] Tao X, Zhu L. Meta-analysis of value of time in freight transportation:A comprehensive review based on discrete choice models[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020, 138:213-233.
[26] 吴文祥, 黄海军. 固定需求交通网络的一般系统最优模型与性质[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(12):58-67.Wu W X, Huang H J. General system optimal model and properties of fixed demand traffic networks[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, 18(12):58-67.
[27] Sheffi Y. Urban transportation network:Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods[M]. Prentice-Hall, 1985.
[28] Sheffi Y. Some analytical problems in logistics research[J]. Transportation Research Part A:General, 1985, 19(5):402-405.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (71471068, 71871037, 71831002)
PDF(1620 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/