The intelligent heterogeneous target ranking model based on interdependent network

LIU Rongxiang, HE Xiaoyuan, TAO Jiuyang

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10) : 2717-2727.

PDF(960 KB)
PDF(960 KB)
Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10) : 2717-2727. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788-2018-2556-11

The intelligent heterogeneous target ranking model based on interdependent network

  • LIU Rongxiang1,2, HE Xiaoyuan1, TAO Jiuyang1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

As the complexity of war continues to increase, the target ranking model must be able to comprehensively rank heterogeneous targets in the battlefield from a system perspective and meet the requirements of dynamic, confrontational, and evolving. Based on the theory of interdependent network, firstly constructs the target system of system from the perspective of confrontation and considers the capabilities of both the enemy and ourselves. Then, the two-stage target ranking algorithm is proposed to realize the dynamic comprehensive sorting of heterogeneous targets acting on different spaces. Finally, the adjustment algorithm based on historical data is designed to ensure the adaptability of the target ranking model. The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by experiments in a theater-level wargame system and comparison with the human commanders' empirical data.

Key words

interdependent network / heterogeneous target ranking / target system of system

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Rongxiang , HE Xiaoyuan , TAO Jiuyang. The intelligent heterogeneous target ranking model based on interdependent network. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(10): 2717-2727 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788-2018-2556-11

References

[1] Wang L, Rong L, Shi X, et al. Target value sequencing based on weighted evidence theory[C]//International Conference on Intelligent Human-machine Systems and Cybernetics, 2011:31-35.
[2] 彭浩然, 龙际梦, 蔡中祥. 基于价值的目标排序模型研究[J/OL]. 弹箭与制导学报:1-9[2018-12-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1234.TJ.20171115.1322.010.html.Peng H R, Long J M, Cai Z X. The research of target sequencing model based on value[J/OL]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance:1-9[2018-12-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1234.TJ.20171115.1322.010.html.
[3] Fox W P, Ormond B, Williams A, et al. Ranking terrorist targets using a hybrid AHP-TOPSIS methodology[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation:Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2016, 13(1):77-93.
[4] Naseem A, Shah S T, Khan S A, et al. Decision support system for optimum decision making process in threat evaluation and weapon assignment:Current status, challenges and future directions[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2017:169-187.
[5] Wen Y F, Shi Z S, Wu Z H. A research on the threat sequencing of ship-self-defense[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011:4967-4972.
[6] Lu Y, Dong Y, Wei X, et al. A hybrid method of redundancy system reliability analysis based on AADL models[C]//IEEE International Conference on Software Quality Reliability and Security Companion, 2018:294-300.
[7] 雷霆. 层级目标体系分析与打击目标行动生成研究[D]. 长沙:国防科学技术大学, 2015. Lei T. Analysis of the hierarchical target system of systems and the generation of target striking actions[D]. Changsha:National University of Defense Technology, 2015.
[8] Lei C, Ma D, Zhang H, et al. Optimal strategy selection for moving target defense based on Markov game[J]. IEEE Access, 2017:156-169.
[9] Haddad H, Moulin B. A framework to support qualitative reasoning about COAs in a dynamic spatial environment[J]. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 22(4):341-380.
[10] Lei T, Zhu C, Zhang W M, et al. Planning for target system striking based on Markov decision process[C]//International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 2013:154-159.
[11] 胡晓峰, 贺筱媛, 饶德虎. 基于复杂网络的体系作战协同能力分析方法研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12(2):9-17. Hu X F, He X Y, Rao D H. Research on mechanism of command and coordination for system of systems operation based on complex network theory[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2015, 12(2):9-17.
[12] Yu L F, Zhang W M, Xiu B X, et al. Efficiency analysis of command networks with different cross-level[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014:1139-1144.
[13] 老松杨. 相依网络研究综述[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2016, 38(1):122-128. Lao S Y. Review of the interdependent networks[J]. Journal of National University of Defence Technology, 2016, 38(1):122-128.
[14] 胡嘉南. 电力通信相依网络的鲁棒性研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学, 2017. Hu J N. Research on the robustness of power communication interdependent network[D]. Harbin:Harbin University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[15] Pournaras E, Ballandies M, Acharya D, et al. Prototyping self-managed interdependent networks:Self-healing synergies against cascading failures[C]//Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self Managing Systems, 2018:119-129.
[16] Goodrum C J, Shields C P, Singer D J, et al. Understanding cascading failures through a vulnerability analysis of interdependent ship-centric distributed systems using networks[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018:36-47.
[17] Buldyrev S V, Parshani R, Paul G, et al. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7291):1025-1028.
[18] Rinaldi S M, Peerenboom J P, Kelly T K, et al. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2001, 21(6):11-25.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374179); The Joint Funding for Major Research Projects Between Military and Civilian Sectors (U1435218); National Defense Technology Innovation Zone Project
PDF(960 KB)

402

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/