Gain and loss: The dispute of photovoltaic trade betweenEU and China

TIAN Kailan, YANG Cuihong

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 1652-1660.

PDF(760 KB)
中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院期刊网
PDF(760 KB)
Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 1652-1660. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2016)07-1652-09

Gain and loss: The dispute of photovoltaic trade betweenEU and China

  • TIAN Kailan, YANG Cuihong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper aims at studying the impact of antidumping on bilateral economy from a new perspective of domestic value added generated by exports through case study. We choose a representative case:photovoltaic products trade dispute between European Union and China. The results show that China suffered 4.88% and 1.84% loss on domestic value-added generated by non-processing and processing trade, separately. Meanwhile, under the background of globalization of production chains, European Union suffered 3.93% loss on domestic value-added. This paper also provides three scenarios to discuss the protective effects of antidumping. However, it turns out to be that European Union will suffer 1.3% loss of value-added even if there is quite low trade diversion. Lose-lose consequences turn up.

Key words

photovoltaic products / antidumping / input-output model / gains and losses / global value chain

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
TIAN Kailan , YANG Cuihong. Gain and loss: The dispute of photovoltaic trade betweenEU and China. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(7): 1652-1660 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788(2016)07-1652-09

References

[1] Prusa T J. On the spread and impact of antidumping[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 2001, 34(3):591-611.
[2] Bown C P. Taking stock of antidumping, safeguards and countervailing duties, 1990-2009[J]. World Economy, 2011, 34:1955-1998.
[3] Pierce J R. Plant-level responses to antidumping duties:Evidence from US manufacturers[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2011, 85:222-233.
[4] Carter C A, Gunning-Trant C. US trade remedy law and agriculture:Trade diversion and investigation effects[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 2010, 43(1):97-126.
[5] Park S. The trade depressing and trade diversion effect of antidumping actions:The case of China[J]. China Economic Review, 2009, 20:542-548.
[6] Li C D, Whalley J. Chinese firm and industry reactions to antidumping initiations and measures[R]. NBER Working Paper, 2010.
[7] 李春顶. 中国对外反倾销措施的产业救济效果研究(1997-2007)[J]. 南方经济, 2011, 5:3-16. Li C D. Industrial remedy effects of Chinese antidumping measures[J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2011, 5:3-16.
[8] Lu Y, Tao Z G, Zhang Y. How do exporters respond to antidumping investigations?[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2013, 91(2):290-300.
[9] Kraemer K, Linden G, Dedrick J. Capturing value in global networks:Apple's Ipad and Iphone[M/OL]. University of California, 2011[2015-01-20]. http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2011/value_iPad_iPhone.pdf.
[10] Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S J. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(2):1-37.
[11] Johnson R C, Noguera G. Accounting for intermediates:Production sharing and trade in value added[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2012, 86(2):224-236.
[12] 张杰, 陈志远, 刘元春. 中国出口国内附加值的测算与变化机制[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 10:124-137.Zhang J, Chen Z Y, Liu Y C. Measuring the domestic value added in China's exports and the mechanism of change[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 10:124-137.
[13] Lau L J, Chen X K, Yang C H, et al. Input-occupancy-output models of the non-competitive type and their application——An examination of the China-US trade surplus[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2010, 31(1):35-54.
[14] Chen X K, Cheng L, Fung K C, et al. Domestic value added and employment generated by Chinese exports:A quantitative estimation[J]. China Economic Review, 2012, 23:850-864.
[15] 段玉婉, 祝坤福, 陈锡康, 等. 区分内外资企业和贸易方式的非竞争型投入产出模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(9):2204-2211.Duan Y W, Zhu K F, Chen X K, et al. Non-competitive input-output model capturing foreign-funded enterprise and trade pattern[J]. Systems Engineering——Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(9):2204-2211.
[16] 陈锡康, 杨翠红. 投入产出技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2011.Chen X K, Yang C H. Input-output technique[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2011.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (71125005);Key Project Supported by Ministry of Commerce of China (TAHP-2015-ZB-365)
PDF(760 KB)

386

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉