出租车与专车服务的平台合作模式对双方利润的影响及溢出效应

杨彤, 吴江宁, 王明征

系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 3249-3259.

PDF(1056 KB)
中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院期刊网
PDF(1056 KB)
系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 3249-3259. DOI: 10.12011/SETP2021-0126
论文

出租车与专车服务的平台合作模式对双方利润的影响及溢出效应

    杨彤1, 吴江宁1, 王明征2
作者信息 +

The impact of platform cooperation of taxi and ride-sourcing services on profits of both parties and spillover effect

    YANG Tong1, WU Jiangning1, WANG Mingzheng2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

出租车服务中的搜索摩擦问题一直困扰着运营者和管理者.专车服务进入市场后，其在线匹配平台较好地解决了乘客打车难和车辆空载等搜索摩擦问题，但也进一步压缩了出租车服务的生存空间.为优化行业运营业态，提出基于平台合作的运营模式，即出租车公司与专车公司合作使用在线平台.通过共享信息模式与联合行动模式两种具体实现方法，服务更多乘客，减少搜索摩擦.尝试构建基于合作的商业生态系统，通过合理化的利润分配，实现两家公司的利润优化.研究结果表明，平台合作模式不仅增加了两家公司的利润，而且产生了溢出效应，使得乘客剩余效用与社会福利提高.算例分析中，使用旧金山市与深圳市的真实数据对公司利润进行了分析，并在拓展分析中对平台合作模式下的多种情境进行了探讨.研究结论为传统经济与平台经济的合作模式提供了一定的管理启示.

Abstract

The problem of search friction in taxi service is always perplexing operators and managers. After the ride-sourcing services entered the market, its online matching platform solved the search friction problems such as the difficulty of taking a taxi for passengers and empty vehicles, but it also made it harder for taxi companies to survive. For the purpose of improving the industry efficiency, the platform cooperation mode is put forward, that is, taxi companies and ride-sourcing services companies cooperate to use the online platform. Through sharing information mode and joint action mode, more passengers can be served and search friction can be reduced. Under a business ecosystem based on cooperation, profit optimization of the two companies is realized through reasonable profit distribution. The results indicate that the platform cooperation model not only improves the profits of the companies, but also show a spillover effect, which is reflected in the improvement of the residual utility of passengers and social welfare. In the example analysis, the data of San Francisco and Shenzhen are used to analyze the profit of the company, and in the extended analysis, a variety of scenarios under the platform cooperation mode are discussed. The research conclusion provides some management enlightenment for the cooperation mode between traditional economy and platform economy.

关键词

出租车服务 / 搜索摩擦 / 平台合作 / 专车服务 / 溢出效应

Key words

taxi service / search friction / platform cooperation / ride-sourcing services / spillover effect

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用
杨彤 , 吴江宁 , 王明征. 出租车与专车服务的平台合作模式对双方利润的影响及溢出效应. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(12): 3249-3259 https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2021-0126
YANG Tong , WU Jiangning , WANG Mingzheng. The impact of platform cooperation of taxi and ride-sourcing services on profits of both parties and spillover effect. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(12): 3249-3259 https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2021-0126
中图分类号： C93    F570   

参考文献

[1] Yang H, Leung C W Y, Wong S C, et al. Equilibria of bilateral taxi-customer searching and meeting on networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2010, 44(8-9):1067-1083.
[2] Yang H, Yang T. Equilibrium properties of taxi markets with search frictions[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2011, 45(4):696-713.
[3] Yang T, Yang H, Wong S C. Taxi services with search frictions and congestion externalities[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2014, 48(6):575-587.
[4] 慕晨, 宣慧玉, 张发, 等. 巡游型出租车运营系统仿真[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(11):183-192.Mu C, Xuan H Y, Zhang F, et al. Simulation study of cruising taxi operation system[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(11):183-192.
[5] 赵道致, 杨洁. 考虑不同监管目标的网约车服务价格管制策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(10):2523-2534.Zhao D Z, Yang J. Research on the price regulation strategy of online car-hailing considering different regulation targets[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(10):2523-2534.
[6] 赵道致, 杨洁, 李志保. 考虑等待时间的网约车与出租车均衡定价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(5):1229-1241.Zhao D Z, Yang J, Li Z B. Research on the equilibrium pricing of online car-hailing and taxi services considering the waiting time[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(5):1229-1241.
[7] Harding S, Kandlikar M, Gulati S. Taxi Apps, regulation, and the market for taxi journeys[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2016(88):15-25.
[8] Van Alstyne M W, Parker G G, Choudary S P. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2016, 94(4):54-62.
[9] Kapoor R. Collaborating with complementors:What do firms do?[J]. Advances in Strategic Management, 2013(30):3-25.
[10] 但斌, 田丽娜, 董绍辉. 考虑溢出效应的互补品企业合作促销行为研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24(4):78-83.Dan B, Tian L N, Dong S H. Research on cooperative sales promotion behavior between the complementary goods enterprises considering spillover effect[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 2010, 24(4):78-83.
[11] Parker G, Alstyne M V, Jiang X. Platform ecosystems:How developers invert the firm[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1):255-266.
[12] Lee M, Han S P, Park S, et al. The positive spillover effect of mobile social games on App literacy[C]//201649th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 2016:746-755.
[13] Li Z, Agarwal A. Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets:Evidence from Facebook's integration of Instagram[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(10):3438-3458.
[14] Adner R, Chen J, Zhu F. Frenemies in platform markets:Heterogeneous profit foci as drivers of compatibility decisions[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(6):2432-2451.
[15] Fay S, Xie J. Probabilistic goods:A creative way of selling products and services[J]. Marketing Science, 2008, 27(4):674-690.
[16] Rice D H, Fay S A, Xie J. Probabilistic selling vs. markdown selling:Price discrimination and management of demand uncertainty in retailing[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2014, 31(2):147-155.
[17] 杨彤, 吴江宁. 平台合作模式对出租车公司利润的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9):208-217.Yang T, Wu J N. Impact of platform cooperation mode on profit of taxi company[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(9):208-217.
[18] 单海燕, 王文平. 面向产量决策的多寡头网络最优结构分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(5):33-43.Shan H Y, Wang W P. Analysis of optimal structure based on output decision in oligopoly networks[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2010, 13(5):33-43.
[19] Toyasaki F, Arikan E, Silbermayr L, et al. Disaster relief inventory management:Horizontal cooperation between humanitarian organizations[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(6):1221-1237.
[20] 徐晋, 廖刚, 陈宏民. 多寡头古诺竞争与斯塔尔博格竞争的对比研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006, 26(2):49-54.Xu J, Liao G, Chen H M. Comparative study on multi-Cournot competition model and multi-Stackelberg competition model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2006, 26(2):49-54.
[21] Hedlund J. Imitation in Cournot oligopolies with multiple markets[J]. Economy Theory, 2015, 60(3):567-587.
[22] Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J]. Economic Journal, 1929, 39(153):41-57.
[23] Xia Y. Competitive strategies and market segmentation for suppliers with substitutable products[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 210(2):194-203.
[24] Yang T, Wu J, Wang J. Duopoly competition between chauffeured car and taxi:An analysis of pricing and market segmentation[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2017, 5(6):511-523.
[25] 杨道箭, 白寅. 基于Hotelling模型的供应链间核心企业竞争与分散式[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(12):3025-3037.Yang D J, Bai Y. Supply chain core firms competition and decentralization based on Hotelling model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(12):3025-3037.
[26] 王海平, 刘树林, 林军. 基于Hotelling模型的双寡头免费增值策略竞争分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4):15-21.Wang H P, Liu S L, Lin J. Competitive analysis of freemium strategy of duopoly software firms based on Hotelling model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(4):15-21.
[27] Ebina T, Matsushima N, Shimizu D. Product differentiation and entry timing in a continuous time spatial competition model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 247(3):904-913.
[28] Pierce A, Sen D. Outsourcing versus technology transfer:Hotelling meets Stackelberg[J]. Journal of Economics, 2014, 111(3):263-287.
[29] Gan J, An B, Miao C. An efficient algorithm for taxi system optimization[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 2014:1465-1466.
[30] Gan J, An B. Game theoretic considerations for optimizing efficiency of taxi systems[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2017, 32(3):46-52.
[31] Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3):668-691.
[32] Douglas G W. Price regulation and optimal service standards:The taxicab industry[J]. Journal of Transport Economics & Policy, 1972, 6(2):116-127.
[33] Oliver R L. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations-An alternative interpretation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62(4):480-486.
[34] 程凤, 霍佳震. 水平穿越法在带有不耐烦顾客的呼叫中心中的建模及应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(5):1247-1254.Cheng F, Huo J Z. Modeling and application of level crossing in call centers with impatient customers[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(5):1247-1254.
[35] 罗兰贝格. "思与行"丛刊:移动互联下的城市综合出行变革[EB/OL].[2021-04-11]. https://www.rolandberger.com/zh/Insights/Publications/《思与行》丛刊:移动互联下的城市综合出行变革.html.
[36] Uber. San Francisco, A mobility case study[EB/OL].[2021-04-11]. http://newsroom.uber.com/2015/06/uscm.
[37] 鞠炜奇, 杨家文, 林雄斌. 城市出租车空载率时空特征及其影响因素研究——以深圳市为例[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(s2):257-262.Ju W Q, Yang J W, Lin X B. Research on the space-time characteristics and influence factors of taxi empty-loading ratio:Shenzhen example[J]. Planners, 2015, 31(s2):257-262.
PDF(1056 KB)

877

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉