文章考虑由一个发电厂和两个电网企业组成的电力供应系统,研究了两个对称的电网企业的电力和可再生能源证书的联合订购策略. 经分析发现,虽然政府规定交易需要配备相应比例的可再生能源证书,但是由于可再生能源证书的需求是依赖于电力的需求量的,所以其决策是可以独立于电力交易的;而可再生能源证书的最优订购数量与其批发价格和政府罚金的比例有关,当该比例较小时,电网企业购买证书的数量较多,反之亦然. 文章还研究了两个电网企业间需求的关联性对各自订购策略及成本的影响,并发现当需求正相关时,随着相关系数的增大,电网企业订购证书的数量逐渐减少,而相应的成本却逐渐增加;当需求负相关时,结论相反,而政府则可以通过调节罚金以降低这种影响.
Abstract
The paper considers a power system which consists of a power plant and two symmetrical electricity companies, and studies the optimal procurement strategies of electricity and renewable energy certificates (RECs) of the companies. The analysis shows that although a certain proportion of RECs is required when the trade is taken place, the demand of RECs is dependent on the demand of electricity and the optimal procurement decision of RECs is independent of the trade of electricity. It finds that, the ratio of the wholesale price of the RECs and the government fine will have impact on the electricity companies' procurement strategies of the RECs, if the ratio is small, the electricity companies tend to purchase a larger amount of renewable energy certificates, and vice versa. The paper also studies the optimal procurement strategy and cost of the two companies whose demands are related, and finds that when the demands are positively related, with the increase of the correlation coefficient, the company procurements less RECs, and its cost decreases; when the demands are negatively related the opposite conclusion obtained; and the government can reduce the impact by adjusting the fine.
关键词
电力 /
可再生能源证书 /
最优购买策略 /
随机需求
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
electricity /
renewable energy certificates /
optimal procurement strategy /
stochastic demand
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号:
F406
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1): 99-116.
[2] Yi H, Feiock R C. Renewable energy politics: Policy typologies, policy tools, and state deployment of renewables[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2014, 42(3): 391-415.
[3] Hohmeyer O H, Bohm S. Trends toward 100% renewable electricity supply in Germany and Europe: A paradigm shift in energy policies[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2015, 4(1): 74-97.
[4] Cheon A, Urpelainen J. How do competing interest groups influence environmental policy? The case of renewable electricity in industrialized democracies, 1989-2007[J]. Political Studies, 2013, 61(4): 874-897.
[5] 吴文建, 任玉珑, 史乐峰. 基于电力供应链收益的可再生能源政策比较[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(3): 44-48. Wu W J, Ren Y L, Shi L F. Comparison of renewable energy policy based on electricity supply chain benefit[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(3): 44-48.
[6] 余顺坤, 周黎莎, 李晨. 基于可再生能源配额制的绿色证书交易SD 模型设计[J]. 华东电力, 2013, 41(2): 281-285. Yu S K, Zhou L S, Li C. System dynamic model design for green certificate trading based on renewable portfolio standard[J]. East China Electric Power, 2013, 41(2): 281-285.
[7] Chen Z, Su Y, Yan H. Optimal purchasing process for electricity and renewable energy credits with price and demand uncertainty[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21(2): 184-203.
[8] Dufo-López R, Bernal-Agustín J L, Contreras J. Optimization of control strategies for stand-alone renewable energy systems with hydrogen storage[J]. Renewable Energy, 2007, 32(7): 1102-1126.
[9] 赵新刚, 王晓永. 基于双边拍卖的可再生能源配额制的绿色证书交易机制设计[J]. 可再生能源, 2015, 33(2): 275-282. Zhao X G, Wang X Y. The design of green certificate trading mechanism based on double auction under the renewable energy quota system[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2015, 33(2): 275-282.
[10] 吴文建, 任玉珑, 史乐峰. 强制上网政策下的可再生能源电力供应链收益分配[J]. 工业工程, 2013, 16(3): 14-20. Wu W J, Ren Y L, Shi L F. Benefit distribution of renewable energy electricity supply chain under mandatory access policy[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2013, 16(3): 14-20.
[11] 钟宇峰, 黄民翔, 文福拴,等. 计及绿色证书交易机制的大用户直购电市场均衡分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2014, 34(2): 144-150. Zhong Y F, Huang M X, Wen F S, et al. Equilibrium analysis of direct electricity purchase with green certificate mechanism[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2014, 34(2): 144-150.
[12] Fisher M, Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales[J]. Operations Research, 1996, 44(1): 87-99.
[13] Sethi S, Yan H, Yan J H, et al. An analysis of staged purchases in deregulated time-sequential electricity markets[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2005, 1(4): 443-463.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}