PDF(486 KB)
PDF(486 KB)
PDF(486 KB)
区间标度群组序关系评价法及其运用
Interval scales rank correlation analysis group evaluation method and its application
传统的主观赋权方法——层次分析法(特征值法)存在若干不足,针对这些不足,序关系分析法给出了一种直观、简便、 易计算的主观赋权方法. 本文对点赋值序关系分析法进行了拓展,考虑到区间数与群组判断的情况,提出了一种区间标度群组序关系评价法, 并进行了实例应用,实例结果表明,该方法更加贴近应用现实.
The traditional subjective weight method-AHP (eigenvalue method) contains certain disadvantages. To overcome these disadvantages, the rank correlation analysis gives an intuitive, simple and easy-to-calculate subjective weight method. The paper extends the rank correlation analysis with point values as scales. The interval numbers and group judgments are considered, and an interval scales rank correlation analysis group evaluation method is put forward. An application example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that this method is closer to the actual application.
区间赋值 / 群组判断 / 序关系分析法 / 综合评价 {{custom_keyword}} /
interval evaluation / group judgment / rank correlation analysis / comprehensive evaluation {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] 郭亚军,潘德惠. 一类决策问题的新算法[J]. 决策与决策支持系统, 1992, 2(3): 56-62.Guo Y J, Pan D H. New algorithm of a category of decision-making problem[J]. Decision-Making and Decision Support System, 1992, 2(3): 56-62.
[2] 张发明,郭亚军,易平涛. 一种主客方协作式群体评价方法及其应用[J].中国管理科学, 2010(4): 145-151.Zhang F M, Guo Y J, Yi P T. A group evaluation method and application based on collaboration of subject and object[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2010(4): 145-151.
[3] 龚艳冰.基于方案偏好和部分权重信息的模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2008(5): 507-509.Gong Y B. Method for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making with preference on alternatives and partial weights information[J]. Control and Decision, 2008(5): 507-509.
[4] 王玮,张玉芝.模糊AHP的权重向量求解方法研究[J].控制与决策, 2006, 21(2): 184-188.Wang W, Zhang Y Z. Method of obtaining eigenvector for a fuzzy AHP[J]. Control and Decision, 2006, 21(2): 184-188.
[5] 张发明,郭亚军,易平涛. 一种基于蒙特卡罗模拟的群体协商评价方法及其应用[J].运筹与管理, 2010(2): 63-67.Zhang F M, Guo Y J, Yi P T. Method and application of group bargaining evaluation based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Operation Research and Management Science, 2010(2): 63-67.
[6] Van Laarhoven P J M, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1-3): 199-227.
[7] Wang Y M, Parkan C. Multiple attribute decision-making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives: Ranking and weighting[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005, 153(3): 331-346.
[8] Lipovetsky S, Michael Conklin W. Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137(1): 110-122.
[9] 许树柏. 层次分析法原理[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1988.Xu S B. Principle of analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[M]. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press, 1988.
[10] 罗承忠.模糊集引论(上册)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社, 1989: 197-199.Luo C Z. The introduction of fuzzy set[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 1989: 197-199.
[11] Pan Y H, Zhang F M, Guo Y J, et al. The interval estimation order relation analysis method and its application[C]// 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, Wuhan: MASS, 2010: 1-4.
[12] 张发明,郭亚军.一种基于两阶段协商的群体评价方法[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31(7): 41-44.Zhang F M, Guo Y J. Method of group evaluation based on two phases-bargaining[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(7): 41-44.
[13] 张勇慧,林 焰,纪卓尚. 基于AHP的运输船舶多目标模糊综合评判[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2002, 22(11): 129-133.Zhang Y H, Lin Y, Ji Z S. Multi-objects fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of sea-going cargo ship by AHP[J]. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2002, 22(11): 129-133.
[14] 吕跃进,郭欣荣. 群组AHP判断矩阵的一种有效集结方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27(7): 132-136.Lü Y J, Guo X R. An effective aggregation method for the AHP judgement matrix in group decision-making[J]. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(7): 132-136.
国家自然科学基金(71001048); 江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ12129); 江西省教育科学"十二五规划"重点(11ZD040)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
