反映式与构成式测量模型的差异:基于TAM的实证研究

王念新, 葛世伦, 王智宁, 吴金南

系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12) : 3127-3138.

PDF(795 KB)
PDF(795 KB)
系统工程理论与实践 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12) : 3127-3138. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2013)12-3127
论文

反映式与构成式测量模型的差异:基于TAM的实证研究

    王念新1, 葛世伦1, 王智宁2, 吴金南3
作者信息 +

Differences between reflective measurement model and formative measurement model:An empirical study with TAM

    WANG Nian-xin1, GE Shi-lun1, WANG Zhi-ning2, WU Jin-nan3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

测量模型的选择是实证研究过程中的重要环节,区分反映式测量模型和构成式测量模型是正确构建管理理论的基础.在分析反映式和构成式两种测量模型差异的基础上,以技术采纳模型为例,通过对7次共1951份实际调查数据的分析,利用偏最小二乘法的结构方程模型,实证比较了两种测量模型在不同的样本规模、不同的研究情境和不同调查时间下外部效度和对内生潜变量解释能力上的差异.研究结果表明反映式测量模型具有稳定的外部效度,构成式测量模型的外部效度受到样本规模、研究情境和调查时间的影响;在因变量解释能力方面,构成式测量模型比反映式测量模型强的假设没有得到支持,即使当构成式测量模型误设为反映式测量模型时,其因变量解释能力也不一定显著增强.

Abstract

Choosing measurement models is a key process in the empirical studies, and the differences between reflective measurement model formative measurement model play an important role in choosing appropriate measurement model and building scientific theories. Based on the differences between reflective measurement model and formative measurement model, an empirical study with technology accept model (TAM) was conducted to investigate the differences of external validity and the explained capability to endogenous latent variables between reflective measurement model and formative measurement model using 1951 samples which were collected in 7 surveys. The results indicate that reflective measurement model has stable external validity, while the external validity of formative measurement model is influenced by sample size, research context, and survey time. The results also suggest that there are no differences in the explained capability to endogenous latent variables between reflective measurement model and formative measurement model. Even if formative measurement model is misspecified as reflective measurement model, the explained capability to endogenous latent variables does not always significantly improve.

关键词

测量模型 / 反映式测量模型 / 构成式模型 / 结构方程模型

Key words

measurement model / reflective measurement model / formative measurement model / structural equation modeling

引用本文

导出引用
王念新 , 葛世伦 , 王智宁 , 吴金南. 反映式与构成式测量模型的差异:基于TAM的实证研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(12): 3127-3138 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788(2013)12-3127
WANG Nian-xin , GE Shi-lun , WANG Zhi-ning , WU Jin-nan. Differences between reflective measurement model and formative measurement model:An empirical study with TAM. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(12): 3127-3138 https://doi.org/10.12011/1000-6788(2013)12-3127
中图分类号: F270   

参考文献

[1] 常亚平, 刘艳阳, 阎俊, 等. B2C环境下网络服务质量对顾客忠诚的影响机理[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(6): 94-106. Chang Y P, Liu Y Y, Yan J, et al. Inuence mechanism of web service quality on customer loyalty in B2C environment[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(6): 94-106.
[2] 王洪伟, 周曼, 何绍义. 影响个人在线提供隐私信息意愿的实证研究 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(10): 2186-2197. Wang H W, Zhou M, He S Y. Empirical research of individuals' intention to provide privacy information online[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(10): 2186-2197.
[3] Levinthal D A, March J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(S2): 95-112.
[4] Jarvis C B, MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff P M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumr research[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003, 30(2): 199-218.
[5] Edwards J R. The fallacy of formative measurement[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2011, 14(2): 370-388.
[6] Diamantopoulos A, Riefler P, Roth K P. Advancing formative measurement models[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2008, 61(12): 1203-1218.
[7] Cenfetelli R, Bassellier G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2009, 33(4): 689-707.
[8] Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw J A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration[J]. British Journal of Management, 2006, 17(4): 263-282.
[9] Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer H M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(2): 269-277.
[10] MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff P M, Jarvis C B. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(4): 710-730.
[11] Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(4): 623-656.
[12] Kim G, Shin B, Grover V. Investigating two contradictory views of formative measurement in information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(2): 345-365.
[13] Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1989: 319-340.
[14] 王念新, 仲伟俊, 梅姝娥. 信息技术、核心能力和企业绩效的实证研究[J]. 管理科学, 2010, 23(1): 52-64. Wang N X, Zhong W J, Mei S E. Information technology, core capability and firm performance: An empirical study[J]. Journal of Management Sciences, 2010, 23(1): 52-64.
[15] Podsakoff N, Shen W, Podsakoff P. The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research[C]// Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2006: 197-252.
[16] Coltman T, Devinney T, Midgley D, et al. Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2008, 61(12): 1250-1262.
[17] Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110(2): 305-314.
[18] Franke G, Preacher K, Rigdon E. Proportional structural effects of formative indicators[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2008, 61(12): 1229-1237.
[19] MacCallum R C, Browne M W. The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114(3): 533-541.
[20] Bollen K. Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007)[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(2): 219.
[21] Mitchell M, Jolley J. Research design explained[M]. Wadsworth Pub Co., 2009.
[22] Brewer M. Research design and issues of validity[J]. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 2000: 3-16.
[23] Campbell D, Stanley J, Gage N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research[M]. Rand McNally Chicago, 1963.
[24] Anderson J C, Gerbing D W. Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982, 19(4): 453-460.
[25] Diamantopoulos A. Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: Response to Baxter's commentary essay[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(1): 91-93.
[26] Howell R, Breivik E, Wilcox J. Reconsidering formative measurement[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(2): 205-218.
[27] Bagozzi R. On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007)[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(2): 229.
[28] Achen C. What does "explained variance" explain?: Reply[J]. Political Analysis, 1990, 2(1): 173-184.
[29] 高平, 刘文雯, 徐博艺. 基于TAM/TTF整合模型的企业实施ERP研究 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, 24(10): 74-79. Gao P, Liu W W, Xu B Y. A study of enterprise ERP implementation based on integrated TAM/TTF model[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2004, 24(10): 74-79.
[30] Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin W. Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources[J]. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 2001, 32(3): 86-112.
[31] Chin W W, Marcolin B L, Newsted P R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study[J]. Information Systems Research, 2003, 14(2): 189-217.
[32] Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005, 16(2): 91-109.
[33] Carte T A, Russell C J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(3): 479-501.
PDF(795 KB)

559

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/