PDF(785 KB)
PDF(785 KB)
PDF(785 KB)
基于改进Shapley值解的流域生态补偿额分摊方法
Method of allocating ecological compensation amount of river basin based on improved Shapley value
为更加公平的在流域各地区分配上游地区生态建设与保护的成本, 以及调动上游地区对流域生态保护的积极性, 本文在假设流域各地区有合作博弈的基础上, 给出基于DEA合作博弈模型的流域生态补偿额分摊方案. 考虑到合作博弈经典Shapley值解的局限性, 本文利用梯形模糊数确定各地区权重的方法对Shapley值解进行改进. 将此生态补偿额分摊方案应用于新安江流域, 结果表明本文提出的分摊方案不仅使各地区有较高投资生态保护的驱动力, 而且在考虑到各地区水源效益的同时, 还结合了流域中水源及其效益等指标的重要性, 更具公平合理性, 同时为其它跨地区流域生态补偿额分摊研究提供了参考.
In order to make the ecological compensation for river basin more reasonable and stimulate the water ecological protection initiatives of the upstream region, the water ecological compensation amount allocation method is proposed based on the model of DEA cooperative game with the supposition of cooperation among different areas along the basin. Considering the limitation of classic Shapley value in cooperative game, this value is improved by the weight among different areas confirmed by trapezoidal fuzzy number. Applied to Xin'an River basin, its result indicates that the allocation method adopted in this paper not only made the driving force for ecoloical protection stronger, but also combined the importance of different index such as the water and its benefits in the basin, meanwhile, the water benefits was considered among different areas. Thus, it is more reasonable, and it could provide reference for the ecological compensation amount allocation research of the other basins cross regions.
合作博弈 / 生态补偿 / 数据包络分析 / Shapley值 / 梯形模糊数 / 新安江流域 {{custom_keyword}} /
cooperative game / ecological compensation / data envelopment analysis / Shapley value / trapezoidal fuzzy number / Xin'an River basin {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] 刘玉龙, 许凤冉, 张春玲, 等. 流域生态补偿标准计算模型研究[J]. 中国水利, 2006(22): 35-38.Liu Y L, Xu F R, Zhang C L, et al. Model for river basin ecological compensation[J]. China Water Resources, 2006(22): 35-38.
[2] 张春玲, 阮本清, 杨小柳. 水资源恢复的补偿理论与机制[M]. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2006: 155-170.Zhang C L, Ruan B Q, Yang X L. Water Resource Recovery Theory and Mechanism of Compensation[M]. Zhengzhou: The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2006: 155-170.
[3] 许凤冉, 阮本清, 汪党献, 等. 流域水资源共建共享理念与测算方法[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(6): 665-670.Xu F R, Ruan B Q, Wang D X, et al. Model for calculating benefit and cost sharing of water resources co-conservation in a river basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(6): 665-670.
[4] 刘玉龙, 胡鹏. 基于帕累托最优的新安江流域生态补偿标准[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(6): 703-708.Liu Y L, Hu P. Ecological compensation standard for Xin'anjiang River basin based on Pareto optimization[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(6): 703-708.
[5] 禹雪中, 杨桐鹤, 骆辉煌. 流域水资源保护补偿标准计算模型[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2010, 27(10): 10-14.Yu X Z, Yang T H, Luo H H. Ecological compensation standard model of water resources protection[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2010, 27(10): 10-14.
[6] 方茜, 陈菁, 代小平, 等. 基于合作收益的跨区域水源保护补偿额测算方法研究[J]. 水利经济, 2011, 29(2): 38-41.Fang X, Chen J, Dai X P, et al. Method for compensation amount of interregional water restoration based on cooperation income[J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2011, 29(2): 38-41.
[7] Jahanshaloo G R, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, et al. An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004, 153(1): 267-274.
[8] Cook W D, Zhu J. Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: A DEA approach[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32(8): 2171-2178.
[9] Amirteimoori A, Shafiei M. Characterizing an equitable omission of shared resources: A DEA-based approach[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 177(1): 18-23.
[10] 李勇军, 梁#
[37] . 基于DEA与联盟博弈的固定成本分摊方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2008, 28(11): 80-84.Li Y J, Liang L. Method of allocating the fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game[J]. Systems Engineering——Theory & practice, 2008, 28(11): 80-84.
[11] 董保民, 王运通,郭桂霞. 合作博弈论[M]. 北京:中国市场出版社, 2008: 1-83.Dong B M, Wang Y T, Guo G X. Cooperation Game Theory[M]. Beijing: China Market Press, 2008: 1-83.
[12] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[13] 刘玉龙. 生态补偿与流域生态共建共享[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007: 115-183.Liu Y L. Ecological Compensation and Rehabilitation-cost Burdening with Conservation-benefit Sharing to Achieve Harmony Watershed Ecosystem[M]. Beijing: China WaterPower Press, 2007: 115-183.
[14] 解传银. 基于权重模型的滑坡灾害敏感性评价[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 42(6): 1772-1779.Xie C Y. Landslides hazard susceptibility evaluation based on weighting model[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42(6): 1772-1779.
[15] 戴建华, 薛恒新. 基于Shapley值法的动态联盟伙伴企业利益分配策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(4): 33-36.Dai J H, Xue H X. The strategy of profit allocation among partners in dynamic alliance based on the Shapley value[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2004, 12(4): 33-36.
[16] 百度百科. 新安江[EB/OL]. [2011-6-30]. http://baike.baidu.com/view/57297.htm.Baidu Online Encyclopedia. Xin'an jiang[EB/OL]. [2011-6-30]. http://baike.baidu.com/view/57297.htm.
[17] 浙江省水利厅. 浙江省水资源公报[M]. 杭州: 浙江省水利厅, 2006.Department of Water Resources of Zhejiang Province. Zhejiang Water Communique[M]. Hangzhou: Department of Water Resources of Zhejiang Province, 2006.
[18] 陈润, 甘升伟, 石亚东, 等. 新安江流域取水许可总量控制指标体系研究[J]. 水资源保护, 2011, 27(2): 91-94.Chen R, Gan S W, Shi Y D, et al. Study on index system of total control of permitted water withdrawal in Xin'anjiang River Basins[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2011, 27(2): 91-94.
国家自然科学基金(51079120, 51109177, 51109175); 公益性行业科研专项(201001011); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(10XJCZH002); 陕西省社会科学基金(11D041); 西安理工大学优秀博士学位论文基金(106-211105)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
